Pride

Apr. 28th, 2019 11:22 pm
letsgetthisbread: (Default)
 HI AGAIN i really need to sleep but I won't so I'm here to spam you all again ;)

I actually wrote a sort-of screenplay for "Pride" (my P&P fic) earlier for reasons unclear (why didn't I just write it in regular fic form? the world will never know); if ur interested, here she is (sorry formatting is strange)



Read more... )
letsgetthisbread: (Default)
 hope nobody else has posted about this yet; if you have, sorry!!


I've been a part of a lot of different fandoms in my life, some of them for longer periods of time and always with different feelings. Like Amy said in her presentation, there are some fandoms I straight up DON'T talk about (see: MLP, Homestuck), some I will talk about only if another fan brings it up (DW, Sherlock, Warriors, Wings of Fire), and a very few I won't shut up about (anything Austen, The Good Place).

In 6th grade, my best friend and I memorized the DW soundtrack (Seasons 5-7) so that we could play it at lunch and quiz each other on which songs were playing (can you tell we were band nerds too?) We'd reference Doctor Who so much that it annoyed some of our friends who weren't fans; one of them told us that, one day, we'd be embarrassed by how openly we fanned out about it. I remember thinking "huh? no way, never!" at that moment; in a couple years though, I'd be mortified by how I let a single obsession take over my entire life. (Are hyperfixations just a thing in middle school??) When friends got me into MLP and Homestuck (again mostly in middle school), I'd stay up late into the night watching/reading both, yet come day I'd pretend I knew nothing about them. (That is, unless one of my super-fan friends wanted to flip out about it with me.)These were fandoms I felt "guilty" about being a part of, and I didn't stay a fan of either for long.

Why is it that some fandoms become more socially "acceptable" to talk about (like Harry Potter, Star Wars, Game of Thrones), but others aren't? Wrt MLP & Homestuck, both had pretty infamous fanbases that I didn't want to be associated with -- but aren't super-fan(girl)s looked down upon in pretty much any fandom?

I think one of the reasons I latched onto Austen was because of my desire to find a "respectable" fandom, if that makes sense. It seemed way more defensible of an interest -- after all, I can throw giant stacks of academic literature at people who call Austen lame chick lit, and there's enough of a history of "Austenmania" that being a superfan isn't unheard of. (The fact that I felt the need to defend my interests is a whole other issue...) Also, there's something a little bit comforting (but also kinda pretentious lol) in fanning out about classic lit. I'd rather be known as "the girl who likes Austen" than "the girl who likes books about dragons," but why should it matter to me, or to anyone?
letsgetthisbread: (Default)
I feel like I haven't posted in a while so here are some of the fics I was talking about in my presentation (+ theoretical essay) if anyone is interested :) My mind was p fuzzy during my presentation, so if ur confused about anything I said pls feel free to hmu!
Read more... )
letsgetthisbread: (Default)
 We were talking in class about how domesticity (and the mundane-ness associated with it) seems to mark the death of heterosexual relationships in cult TV. However, I think this is pretty relevant to relationships in realist fiction as well, at least in cases where domesticity isn't a central element (e.g. not like Modern Family, Little House on the Prairie, etc.). For example, in books/shows where a heterosexual romance/courtship is central to the story, the plot tends to end after the "marriage" (or equivalent) scene. Even fan authors seem hesitant to expand on the "after," unless it's a one-shot (or series of one-shots). The example I'm thinking of here is Pride and Prejudice. Austen has a paragraph or two at the end that's basically a vague "happily ever after" (and it's pretty similar for most of her books), and occasionally talked about the fate of her couples post-story in letters to her sister, but otherwise all the more "domestic" parts are left up to the imaginations of the readers. In the P&P fandom, nobody really seems to care enough about Lizzy/Darcy (or Jane/Bingley or literally anyone) post-marriage -- most fanfiction is pre-marriage, and any post-marriage fics are usually one-shots and/or super unpopular overall.

Jones' article also talks about the Xena the Warrior Princess fic where Xena and Gabriella raise a family, and I'm super curious as to how popular that fic was (or how popular Kirk/Spock domestic fics are). Are domestic fics more entertaining than domestic TV? If domesticity is a threat to keeping characters (and our own lives) interesting, then why is it still held as an ideal??? It's weird to think that, in a society where sexuality is so policed and that non-heterosexual relationships are so often oppressed, heterosexual relationships seem to have less freedom in how they can progress. We assume heterosexual couples will end up raising a family, etc., but that homosexual couples don't have to/can still go on adventures.
letsgetthisbread: (Default)
I was sick on Thursday and couldn't make it to class, so here's my 2 cents on the Tosenberger paper! (...Am I doing this right? Pls send help)


I thought it was interesting that Tosenberger starts off by summarizing what fanfiction is (and isn't). The article was published in a journal called "Childen's Literature" (I think?) so perhaps there aren't a ton of articles concerning fics in this category? (I would've thought there would be though, so maybe this kind of intro is just standard protocol.) I wasn't sure if I agreed with her definition of fanfiction, specifically regarding how she says that "Fanfiction (“fanfic” or “fic,” for short) differs from other forms of “recursive” fiction (Langford 805)—such as Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Geraldine Brooks’s Pulitzer Prize–winning March, and every Sherlock Holmes pastiche ever created—by its unofficial methods of distribution" (185). Like, y'all, what the heck is an official method of distribution?? There's a lot of Jane Austen fanfiction (JAFF) that's gotten published, so has it graduated from fanfic status? I guess we could also assume it has to have "widespread" distribution in pop culture -- a la Pride and Prejudice and Zombies -- but even then, I'd argue that fanfiction could accomplish that. Idk man


I thought this line was particularly striking: "In short, the insistence that slash must transgress the existing canon rather troublingly assigns to the canon a heteronormativity it may not necessarily possess" (187). It reminds me of the "Why is Straight the Default?" scene from "Love, Simon," and the fact that nearly all the YA novels I consumed as a kid had a white, (presumably) straight protagonist. (I remember really distinctly this one time in 7th grade where I'd been reading a book and about halfway through realized the protag wasn't white. I literally stopped for moment and went "wait, what?" because the image I'd had in my head -- 'according to the dictates of YA lit' /s -- was wrong.) There's a quote by Julad later: "[S]lash is not so much queer in the act as it is queer in the space . . . . Slash is a sandbox where women come to be strange and unusual, or to do strange and unusual things, or to play with strange and unusual sand" (190). I feel like the association of queerness and strangeness is still there for a lot of fans (like Julad), although it is not necessarily meant to be a negative one. (It's kinda hard to see "strangeness" as not having a negative connotation though, so maybe it's sorta sarcastic and riffing off our heteronormative society?)


This article was the first time I'd heard the terms "buddyslash," "enemyslash," and "powerslash." (I've heard them more as tropes/tags like "friends to lovers" or "enemies to lovers" so it's interesting that academics seem to have created their own terms to avoid using ones that might be more unwieldy?) Tosenberger goes on to talk about how early slash fics tended to address homophobia as an obstacle that their pairing had to overcome, and how that trend is (mostly) fading. In the future, when non-heterosexual relationships are (hopefully) treated as equal to heterosexual ones, I wonder if the idea of "slash" will still hold? (Will writers still feel the need to make a distinction?)

letsgetthisbread: (Default)
Ok, so this is honestly one of the most iconic fics ever so y'all prob already know about this, but one of the strangest HP fics I've ever read is probably "Hogwarts School of Prayers and Miracles." (Here's the link on ff.net!) It's supposedly written by an evangelical Christian mom (by the pseudonym of "proudhousewife") and changes the entire universe so that it's basically just about Harry and his friends (now American) who go to school to "learn" how to be Christians. (Voldemort is now apparently conspiring with Congress to illegalize Christianity.) It's probably the weirdest HP fic I've read because of lines like "Lovely, ladylike tears began to roll down [Hermione's] terrified face." It's almost certainly a parody, but it's ridiculous (and ridiculously funny) all the same :)
letsgetthisbread: (Default)
Hedwig was a clever girl, quicker than most owls and even some people.
 
One fateful day, she’d been taken out of the Eeylops Owl Emporium. Cage set down by Hagrid in front of a very small, very astonished wizard, she’d fallen in love with Harry’s wide green eyes and untidy jet-black hair. He was her boy, and she’d fly anywhere for him.
 
Hedwig was returning from France the night Aunt Marge had blown up. She circled Number Four anxiously, unable to find him. But if she couldn’t find him here, he’d find her where they first met. So, in a single, deft movement, she pivoted toward Diagon Alley, wingbeats resounding on the crisp midnight air.
letsgetthisbread: (Default)
 A lot of children's and YA books like to use the whole "adults are incompetent so the teens have to save the world" bit, and it makes enough sense when your main characters are the same age as your target audience. But, really, why does the Ministry suck so bad?

Justice is at the core of PoA, and is introduced super early when Harry has to write an essay about the Salem Witch Trials. JK narratexplains that most of the people convicted weren't even witches/wizards, and those who were could easily fake their deaths and go off doing their thing elsewhere. (Side note, but has anyone read the poem "Half-Hanged Mary" by Margaret Atwood? It's soooo good it's one of my all-time favs.) There's a lil recap in the beginning of the book where it mentions how Harry got his scar, and inadvertently defeated Voldemort as a baby. It's kinda funny, that it wasn't the Ministry or the (old) Order of the Phoenix or anyone who defeated Voldy, but a 1-year-old.

When Cornelius Fudge waves away the rules governing using magic outside of school when he finds Harry (post-Aunt Marge blow-up), he's pandering to a 13-year-old. When the Ministry effectively sets up a "witch hunt" to find Sirius Black, it's basically just another pointless way to make a statement of "justice."  The Committee for the Disposal of Dangerous Creatures is shown as corrupt and immoral (easily swayed by Lucius Malfoy's power) and basically useless as well. In the end, it's *spoiler* up to Harry and Hermione, two teens, to fix the timeline and administer their own kind of justice (saving Buckbeak and Sirius), at the advice but otherwise without the help of Dumbledore. Magical or not, bureaucracy is always lame :/
letsgetthisbread: (Default)
I'm def gonna bring this up in class if I have a chance, but did any of y'all take issue with JK's characterization of all the "bad" characters in HP? I never realized this as a kid, but she so heavily relies on the "ugly/unattractive = bad" trope that it honestly gets on my nerves. With Dudley and Vernon Dursley, she's constantly got this "hahahha they're fat" joke going on, and also with Crabbe (and Goyle maybe?) and countless others. Aunt Petunia is "horse-faced," and Pansy Parkinson has a "face like a pug."

That's not to say JK constantly mary-sues the physical appearance of all of the more positively-portrayed characters, but what's Harry's "untidy jet-black hair" and "knobbly knees" and Hermione's "bushy brown hair" (not really even all that negative anyway) to how JK portrays the Dursleys + co. and so many of the Slytherins? (Not to mention Hermione ends up as an example of the "beautiful after all" trope when she shows up at the Yule Ball. Not every heroine has to be secretly -- if not overtly -- a hottie :///) It also doesn't super help that, in the movies, the main cast is hella cute while the "villains" tend not to be.

This isn't a legit article (it's a Quora post) but here's someone who contends that Harry (and by extension, JK Rowling) isn't fat-shaming Dudley/the Vernons. Thoughts?
letsgetthisbread: (Default)
 

“Graduation Day,” the two-part third season finale of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, opens in a sea of red. They’re the graduation gowns, piled up on the table like lifeless husks. Cordelia’s unamused by the color choice, and I have to agree really, because my own shiny-plasticy, trashbag-chic gowns were maroon. It’s not a dignifying color, as Xander claims; it’s just depressed red. Either by morbid humor or bad fashion sense, someone thought to deck the seniors in blood; it checks out—high school is a bloodbath after all, and literally so in BtVS.


It’s the day before Buffy and crew are set to graduate, and, in the ‘Dale, no calendar-worthy event goes by without at least a ‘lil violence. Though they don’t know it yet, the Class of ‘99 is gearing up for battle. This week’s big bad? The patriarchy.


While Xander and Cordelia walk off together, Willow’s exchanging yearbooks; it’s only our slayer who comes into the shot alone. She joins Willow—in person but not in sentiment, because Buffy’s slayer duties mean she can’t afford to be nostalgic about high school—and sits dejectedly, thinking she’ll be spending gradu-ascension night saving the world alone. It’ll be the same through the whole episode: surrounded by friends, but still totally on her own, mentally and emotionally.

Even so, this isn’t the first time a slayer’s had to give up a “normal life” in the face of her duties to the world, and certainly won’t be the last—between Sineya’s kidnapping by the Shadow Men and Kendra’s parents giving her up to the Watchers, Buffy doesn’t seem to have it that bad. The (nearly entirely) male hierarchy that is the Watchers Council has no problem subsuming their slayers’ identities for the “common good.”


This episode is a rough one for our gals, and especially Buffy. She’s been planning to defeat Sunnydale’s mayor post-ascension and handling the emotional aftermath of her breakup with Angel, but she hasn't prepared to kill Faith. Faith, on the other hand, is dealing with the dissolution of her sense of self as a result of her attachment to mayor-dad Wilkins. Anyanka renounces being a vengeance demon and reveals her feelings toward Xander, and Joyce Summers essentially marginalized—an unimportant footnote on the edges of the episode’s narrative.


We first see Faith at Professor Worth’s house, sent on an assasination mission by Mayor Wilkins. When Worth feebly asks why the mayor wants him dead, Faith responds “I never thought to ask.” Wait, what? In “Bad Girls,” only seven episodes before, Faith’s accidental murder of the deputy mayor marked the first time she’d killed a human being. And his death so profoundly impacted her; thus the idea that she has now so easily slipped from vampire-slayer and human-slayer is even more disturbing. It’s weird because Faith is a normally a wildcard, and not someone to take orders without question. Her need for a father figure is fulfilled by working for the mayor, leading to Faith’s effective “taming” by a male-dominated power structure. In this way, Faith’s progressive loss of humanity seems to correspond to her proximity to the patriarchy.


The mayor praises Faith on killing Worth the next day, and she appears in a (very feminine and very un-Faith) floral dress. She’s being consumed by societal notions of female beauty, by the literally (pre-)demonic patriarchy. “It just isn’t me though,” says Faith, because she’d know best, right? The mayor replies: “Nobody knows who you are.” He doesn’t give her a choice—Faith’s identity is being rebranded, not just ‘feminized’ in a stereotypical and binary way. Her “edge” is taken off, which surprisingly serves to make her more dangerous to Buffy and crew rather than less. Not only that, but she’s infantilized. (“I’ll buy you an ICEE.” Mayor Wilkins offers with a fatherly grin.) She’s lost the core of her rebellious spirit, and given up her agency willingly in exchange for protection in the form of a patriarch.


Faith’s not the only slayer to have gained a “dad” in their mentor; Buffy has Giles. However, Giles’ aptitude as a father figure sometimes serves to highlight Joyce’s deficiencies as Buffy’s actual parent, especially in “Graduation Day.” In an unfair undercutting of Joyce’s character, this episode shows Giles as especially smart, capable, and supportive, as he shows his prowess with a saber, deduces which demon the mayor will turn into, and supports Buffy in her rejection of the Watchers Council. Meanwhile, Joyce is portrayed as the clueless and naive mom, becoming a liability at best and absurd at worst. She only appears for one scene, in which Buffy convinces her mom to leave town. Confused, Joyce jokingly asks: “What, is some terrible demon going to attack the school?” Unlike the viewers, Joyce is nearly constantly playing catch-up, and her realization is as painfully slow in comparison to what seems painfully obvious to us. “Looking back at everything that’s happened, maybe I should’ve sent you to a different school,” Joyce says to Buffy. And as funny as that line is, it only emphasizes her distance from Buffy’s daily life by showing her carelessness as a parent and a fundamental misunderstanding of her daughter’s duty as a slayer.

Meanwhile, back in school, Anya and Xander are in class. In front of them, the teacher forebodingly plays hangman on the board. I’d really like to think this is some kind of nuanced interpretation of the effect of male authority, and about how a metaphorical noose is collectively tied around everyone’s necks—wherever the patriarchy arises, your voice is cut off—but it’s also just hangman so maybe nobody really cares.


Instead we have this: Anya awkwardly trying to ask out Xander. She’s no longer a demon exacting revenge on fuckbois and living her life as the Patron Saint of The Women Scorned, she’s a simple high school girl trying her darndest to watch sports with a boy. Later, Anya will try to convince Xander to leave Willow and Oz and get the hell outta the Hellmouth with her. Xander refuses, and Anya is vilified for attempting to break up the Scoobies. In this new, strange, patriarchal world, she no longer has power over others. She can’t adapt, and she suffers for it. Not even the writers take pity on her, making her ridiculous with some of her lines. (See: “Men like sports. I’m sure of it.” and, after arguing with Xander, “Aren’t we gonna kiss?”) In a way, she’s self-infantilizing; now that she’s back on the mortal coil, she’s taken to worn-out tropes about gender and heterosexual romance because of her immediate instinct that loss of her demonhood equates to loss of power as a female in the face of a patriarchical society.


Later, at night, Buffy is scouting the dead professor’s apartment for info about the ascension. Angel appears, despite having already broken up with Buffy, as “backup.” He takes a heavy crate of books from Buffy, but she’s still holding the emotional burden. From afar, Faith plays cupid’s evil twin, shooting a poison-tipped arrow into Angel’s back (just missing his heart) and forcing the two ex-lovers back together. When Faith reports back to boss/dad Wilkins, her t-shirt has a heart with a sword stabbed through it. (This slayer knows what she’s about, son.)


What Faith does is distract Buffy, and to drive her into neglecting her slayer identity to help another. Back at his apartment, Buffy tries to comfort the feverish Angel, forcing her to take on a stereotypically feminine caring role at the expense of her slayer duties and identity. She’s approaching the “selfless martyr” trope, and it’s played straight in one way (when she saves Angel by punching him into feeding on her, at her own expense) and subverted in another.


Wesley Wyndam-Price, Giles’ replacement and major wet-blanket, is unable to get help for Angel from the Watchers Council, and tells Buffy that she needs to follow orders (i.e. save the world, not your boyfriend). Buffy refuses, and renouncing the Council on the spot. “This is mutiny.” Wesley says. “I like to think of it as graduation.” Buffy replies. Unwilling to sacrifice her love for a “greater cause,” she yeets the patriarchal circlejerk that is the Watchers Council.


Ultimately, Buffy doesn’t have to choose between sacrificing the love of her life and her duty as a slayer, but that comes later. When Oz reads that drinking the blood of a slayer will cure Angel, Buffy sets out to kill Faith. Xander is afraid of losing Buffy, but not because he thinks that Faith’ll beat her. He’s right, in that part of Buffy’s identity includes the fact she doesn’t kill people. Murdering Faith wouldn’t be the same as staking a vampire: she’d both be fighting an alternate universe self, and sacrificing her morals for the benefit of others. While opposing the patriarchy in its extension of Faith, Buffy is also forced to subordinate her own wishes.


The Slayers prepare for their showdown. Buffy washes her face and looks in the mirror, maybe taking stock of her identity as a vampire-slayer one last time before she does something much more morally dubious. In a scene across town, Faith trains on a punching bag; it’s in her fight scenes that we remember she still has an independent identity of her own, rather than being an unthinking tool of the patriarchy.


Buffy shows up at Faith’s in a black leather jacket and red pants, a mirror to Faith’s getup. This is a change for Buffy, who rarely sacrifices her stereotypically ‘girly’ fashion sense, even when fighting the baddest of bads. Faith comments on this in a double entendre when Buffy insinuates that she’ll have no problem killing Faith: “Well, look at you. All dressed up in big sister’s clothes.” She recognizes that Buffy is trying on a new identity—one that is willing to kill another person. In a way, Faith is also calling Buffy’s bluff, since this is a radical departure from Buffy as she knows her. But when you carry the responsibility of the world on two petite shoulders, the world tends not to care too much about your individuality anyway.

Besides visual coding, her status as a lone hero(ine) is emphasized as distinctly unfeminine, and therefore un-Buffy. The slayers fight in the penthouse and then on the roof, and Buffy stabs Faith; it’s almost poetic, because the knife Buffy uses was a gift Faith received from the mayor. In this way, Faith’s trust in a male-centered power structure has been her undoing.“You killed me.” Faith grins, briefly reclaiming her sense of self before falling backwards, seemingly dead, onto a moving truck.

letsgetthisbread: (Default)
Despite the age of her works, the Austen fandom is thriving. Pride & Prejudice, is (pretty predictably) a fandom favorite, along w its angsty cousin Persuasion (we stan cinnamon roll Anne <3). Because of P&P's popularity both inside + outside of the fan community, a lottttttt of adaptations of it have been made. (Go to the bottom if u wanna see a list b/c she's real long.) Surprisingly (or maybe not), a lot of the published and/or commercially produced adaptations are disliked by the fandom.

Exhibit A: Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
P&P&Z started out as a novel by Seth Grahame-Smith. Most of the novel is just P&P word-for-word, with little bits about zombies (called "unmentionables") sprinkled in (plus also a couple of pretty minor plot changes, e.g. Wickham SPOILER is undead-ish but still a fuckboi). The movie is equal parts terrible and amazing. Mr. Collins (played by Matt Smith) is my fav character in the film, which is probably already a red flag. For hardcore fans of P&P, it's hard to appreciate the acting when all the major players are hella OOC. (Also Darcy sounds like he constantly needs a cough drop, so that's fun??) P&P&Z ranks high in badass gal power a la BtVS, but suffers from some pretty funky writing.* (You can view this mess for yourself here.)

Exhibit B: Mr. Darcy Takes a Wife
Oh god. I can actually feel my soul departing my body every time I remember this series exists?? Normally I feel kinda terrible trashing someone's hard work but here I'll make an exception. Linda Berdoll's adaptations are not a fav. The first book takes up where P&P leaves off, and essentially reads like someone trying to put as many SAT words in a single sentence as humanly possible. When the writing is decipherable, it's a lot of graphic sex scenes -- and I am so not a fan of eroticizing Austen works. The entire series profits off of the whole stereotype of women only liking Austen because they're like "ooOoOoOOh mr darcyyyy, he is sOO sexy!!!1!" There's a lot of problems with this. Austen's so often portrayed as chicklit, and although chicklit is far from worthless, P&P is so frequently devalued because of this association. (I'll legit GO OFF about this. I'd fight anyone for Jane.) There's a hilarious review of the first book (chapter by chapter) here.

Exhibit C: Pride and Prejudice (2005)
Oooh ok, so this is a tough one. The 1995 P&P miniseries with Colin Firth is generally thought to be the "best" adaptation, partially because it very closely follows the canon.  The 2005 movie with Keira Knightley and Matthew Macfadyen gets a lot of flak because it values the ~aesthetic~ and romantic over loyalty to Austen's plot (which it follows pretty well, honestly). A lot of people (re: my mom) complain that Knightley's Lizzy is "too modern," but like..... the character of Elizabeth Bennet was pretty "modern"  for Austen's time anyhow? (Also my mom didn't actually even read P&P... like Susan I don't think ur the greatest authority on the subject sorry not sorry.) Much of the backlash tends to come from fans of the 1995, who can't bear to think that another adaptation could come close to their fav.


ANYWAY, on to the topic I was supposed to talk about: intellectual property. I'd always thought that authors/creators who were vehemently against fan adaptations of their works were especially afraid of getting trashy fics or erotic content associated with their original works, especially if these adaptations were published and profited the other person. (It's like a group presentation where you do all the work, and all your teammates get As too even though they BS'ed thru the powerpoint slides you wrote for them.) Even so, the hypothetical "other person" did do work, and created something. The problem isn't just about who owns it and/or who gets the money; if the adaptation is truly "trash" in the original author's eyes, they might not even want it to exist. 

According to this JASNA article, Austen made less than $11,000 from P&P (she sold the copyright for a fairly low amount, not anticipating the novel becoming a hit). Her lifetime earnings were around $67,000. Austen is hella dead, and her works are in the public domain. If it IS fair to profit off of her, it seems like it can't be fair that only SOME are allowed to. Pride and Prejudice (2005) grossed $121 million by riding the Austenmania wave. But fans still get reprimanded for taking scenes from the movie (or other adaptations) to create fanvids and other content. Austen no longer belongs to Austen, but it doesn't entirely belong to her fans either. Her work lives on, but at what cost?

(p.s. thank u for listening 2 my ted talk)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



*There's this moment where the assembly hall is overrun by zombies, and the Bennet squad casually slices em all in a fun bloody montage. Meanwhile, Darcy (zombie-hunter extraordinaire) and sweet, sweet Bingley are standing awkwardly to the side, watching instead of fighting for reasons unknown. THEN Darcy's killer line comes: "Her [Lizzy's] face is rendered uncommonly intelligent by the beautiful expression of her dark eyes" *cue Lizzy slicing a zombie* "and I'm forced to acknowledge her figure as both light and pleasing." Y'all. He's monologging. Bingley turns to him with a why tf are you telling me this? "her arms are surprisingly muscular yet not so much as to be unfeminine." Darcy,,, PAL,,, I love Lizzy too but what? r u ok?




**Keep in mind these are only the most famous/major P&P adaptations -- prepare urself

Films:
- Pride & Prejudice (1940) w/ Laurence Olivier & Greer Garson
- Pride & Prejudice (2005) w/ Keira Knightley (the Love of my Life) & Matthew Macfadyen
- Bride & Prejudice; bollywood P&P + a Bop
- Pride & Prejudice & Zombies; (also a ""book"") charles bingley is cute & the bennet sibs r cute and the rest of the movie is tRASH
- Pride & Prejudice: A Latter-Day Comedy; modern day in Utah (imagine a crack vid but made movie-length)
- Austenland; movie is wayyyyyyyy better than the book??

Miniseries/TV:
- Pride & Prejudice (1995) w/ Jennifer Ehle & Colin Firth <--- the most #iconic
- Orgulho e Paixão; super recent (2018?) adaptation/mashup of Austen novels in 20th century Brazil, not to mention older adaptations like Orgullo & Prejuicio (Spanish) & Orgoglio e pregiudizio (Italian)
- "Furst Impressions"; episode of Wishbone (a kid's show) where Darcy is a dog it's low key my fav
- Lizzie Bennet Diaries; youtube series
- Lost in Austen; the only thing i like from this is that caroline bingley is a lesbian

Novels:
- Bridget Jones' Diary + all the films that spawned from that
- Death Comes to Pemberley; murder mystery following end of P&P, also turned into a miniseries
- Pride & Prejudice & Zombies; only valuable b/c of the scene where (*spoiler*) lizzy boutta kill darcy
- Austenland; i mean,,, it's OK
- Eligible; i've never read but it's modern day and supposed 2 be good
- Mr. Darcy Takes a Wife; unfortunately spawned a whole series of novels (emphasis on "spawn")

Theatre/Musical:
- lots??? i don't know most
- Christmas at Pemberley; idk much but i heard it's fluffy
- Pride & Prejudice musical is in production!! :) can we get lin manuel-miranda on this pls

letsgetthisbread: (Default)
Okay, imma just say this straight (lol) out: I'm queer, and I was hella confused reading this article.

There was a particular point that resonated with me (see quote below*): the idea that a lot of modern representations of queer characters tend to assimilate them into relatively "undiverse" heteronormative worlds. I'm not super sure how I feel about this trend -- on one hand, it might be more realistic or help to negate some of the stereotypes associated with being queer ("The Gays (TM)... they're just like us!"); on the other hand, is this absorption of queer characters into only one kind of social narrative denigrating to queer culture? It reminds me a bit of how a friend of mine (also queer) thought that the show "Queer Eye" wasn't actually all too progressive; she argued that it commercialized gay culture to a non-queer audience, presenting queer-identifying individuals as being present to solve problems for straight people.

* "Buffy defies the late-twentieth-century American visual politics through which queerness was rendered compatible with bourgeois heterosexual  values and consumer capitalism...In contrast to those programmes, which  portray  their  LGBT  subjects  as  being  isolated  in  static  straight  worlds, Buffy illustrates the power of queerness to reject assimilation and to insist on the reality and accessibility of alternative social formations" (Keegan 11)


Later in the paper, during discussion of "Hush," Keegan argues that "the scene of Willow and Buffy wandering down a street occupied by a silent yet turbulently disordered  society  is  an  ideal  illustration  of  how  the  rational  discourse  of  heteronormativity  is,  in  reality,  a  repressive  regime" (18). In this episode, lack of communication actually brings about a lot of change in the show's several relationships. Xander and Anya become closer, Buffy and Riley finally kiss (and also find out their respective identities), Giles and Olivia become estranged again, and (of course) Tillow is introduced. I'm not really sure what the significance of The Gentlemen being coded as effeminate is, but it is interesting to consider how the effective "silencing" of the (presumably) non-queer characters (since the queer characters are already "silenced" by virtue of not adhering to social norms) leads to a certain amount of liberation to everyone.

But then there are lines like "Buffy, therefore, defends notions of democratic sociality through  its  melodramatic  deployment  of  queer  negativity as a utopian force" (12). I'm sorry, what?

letsgetthisbread: (Default)
 (minor spoilers for BtVS ep. "Graduation Day" -- read at your own risk!!)

 

“When I was a kid, a couple of miles outside of Boston there was this quarry…”
 
~~~
 
Years ago, on a rock forty feet above a putrid green lake, stood an eight-year-old Faith Lehane.
 
Behind her, gaggle of scrappy Boston kids watched, half innocent expectation, half affected boredom.
 
The ringleader (a pretty blonde thing) stared her down. “She’s a wuss. She ain’t gonna jump.”
 
Faith tilted her chin up defiantly, a smirk on her lips. “Naw, I can do it. Real easy.”
 
She edged toward the rim of the rock.
 
She wasn’t afraid, not at the quarry. (Home was different.)
 
Faith took a breath.
 
She jumped.
letsgetthisbread: (Default)
Last week, I tried to explain Warriors as kind of like Harry Potter with cats, which really doesn't do it justice. So imma try again:

The Warriors series basically revolves around the lives of a (pretty dang big) population of feral cats living in the wild. They live in a strict hierarchical society in which each of the four "clans" has a leader, deputy, medicine cat, etc. The clans (ThunderClan, RiverClan, WindClan, and ShadowClan) have an intense rivalry which means that they are almost always at odds with each other. They fight frequently over territory (although the "Warrior Code" mostly prevents them from killing each other) and meet peacefully only once a month in a central region at the heart of the entire forest. They worship/get guidance from their ancestors (united in "StarClan"), and live out their cat lives doing cat things like killing mice. On the surface, it seems pretty harmless. But it's really weird now to think that, as a kid, my favorite books were about anthropomorphized cats and their tendencies toward violence, nationalism and religious fanaticism.

In light of Thursday's discussion, I tried to remember to what extent the Warriors series dealt with feminist themes. The books were (and still are) written by a team of female authors under the pseudonym of "Erin Hunter." (I couldn't find if any of them actually explicitly said they were feminists, but I'd be surprised if any of them were very blatantly anti-feminist.) I read Warriors a lot (and I mean A LOT) during my formative years, so I wondered if that contributed to my current ideas about gender. So here's what I remember (and didn't realize) about gender and feminism with regards to the series:

In the original series, the main character (Rusty/Firepaw) is male. Most (if not all?) of his friends (and therefore the major characters) are male as well. At the beginning of the series, Rusty is a "kittypet" (housepet) who is convinced by Bluestar (the leader of ThunderClan, the local group of feral cats) to run away from his owners and join her clan. In the later generations, a lot more female characters (especially female main characters) are introduced. I wondered if Firepaw and his best friend being male was a marketing tactic (would the series appeal to a greater audience that way?) but also they're cats... Would it have really mattered if Firepaw was a gal-cat? Anyway, moving on...

In the first book, Bluestar and Spottedleaf (ThunderClan's medicine cat) are probably the most prominent female characters. And while they're in positions of power in the clan, they're also subject to martyrdom, which is too often coded as a feminine requirement.

Some quick background: when a member of clan leadership dies, the leader chooses a new deputy (or the deputy ascends to leader and then chooses a new deputy) shortly after. There aren't any technical gender-restrictions, but female cats currently nursing/taking care of young kits aren't ever chosen, presumably because they're currently "too busy" being mothers. Before she became a leader, Bluestar secretly had kittens with a RiverClan warrior (forbidden because they were from different clans). When the old leader of ThunderClan died, Bluestar was forced to bring her kits to RiverClan (pretending to have lost them to a fox) so that she could both follow her ambition of becoming deputy and prevent another hyper-aggressive cat from becoming it instead. In this way, ambition and motherhood are portrayed as incompatible -- Bluestar must sacrifice her children for the good of the clan.

As a medicine cat, Spottedleaf faces a similar scenario. Medicine cats are dual physicians and religious leaders; they're expected to dedicate their life to their practice, and are therefore not allowed to have a mate or kits. There are no gender-based restrictions on this position either, although most of the medicine cats shown early in the series are female. In the first book, Firepaw has a major crush on Spottedleaf. This ends in tragedy when she is soon killed off trying to protect ThunderClan's kittens from an attacking clan. (Similarly, Silverstream, the RiverClan bootycall of Firepaw's best friend Graystripe, dies tragically in childbirth/kittenbirth.) In a later series, a medicine cat named Leafpool (Firepaw's -- now Firestar's -- daughter) demotes herself from medicine cat when the clan finds out she had kits -- and not only that, but with a WindClan warrior (ooh, scandalous). In each case, the female characters are performing the ultimate sacrifice for the good of the clan, or are in some way punished/self-punish for breaking The Rules (TM), which seems almost slut-shamey, just in a weirdly non-human context.
letsgetthisbread: (Default)

There’s a lot of K/S on ao3. Like. A Lot. Most of it’s explicit, some of it has plot, and there are a rare few that just really slap. I’d like to posit that “Warm Thoughts,” written by an author pseudonym’d lettered, is one of these. This fic explores the Hurt/Comfort trope with regard to the aftermath of Spock and Kirk’s koon-ut-kal-if-fee fight in The Original Series episode “Amok Time.” The basic premise of the fic is that, six months after Spock’s pon farr and the events on Vulcan, Spock still refuses to talk to Kirk about what happened. After investigating Epsilon Tauri Four (which is, according to the author’s description, basically Ithaca on account of it being mad brick), Kirk is mysteriously afflicted with perpetual cold. While Uhura tries to determine the cause, McCoy tries to synthesize a cure, and everyone tries to get Spock and Kirk to finally have a damn conversation.

Unlike other Hurt/Comfort fics, Spock is principally responsible for Kirk’s “Hurt”; Kirk’s ailment makes him feel cold, but he is only in discomfort as opposed to any real danger. Instead, Kirk’s mental and emotional strain is the real source of his suffering, although in the universe of the fic he has been operating under it ever since Vulcan. Throughout the narrative, Kirk’s condition is a parallel to (and almost a physical manifestation of) his emotional pain. Meanwhile, Spock is going through something similar, albeit without a visceral component; the fic suggests that Spock’s latent romantic feelings toward Kirk were exposed by his passionate fighting and killing of him on Vulcan. In lettered’s story, Spock’s intense guilt about the whole ordeal has lead him to completely repress his emotions and to avoid conversation about it. Accordingly, Kirk’s been increasingly dispirited for the past few months (with “rather less sanguinity than usual”), unwilling to confront Spock and slowly losing hope for their friendship. Through “Warm Thoughts” author implies that a lack of meaningful reconciliation after “Amok Time” might have resulted in tension between the two lifelong friends; the endangerment of Kirk’s life is the only thing that allows Spock to break free of his emotional restraint.

In the beginning of the story, nearly every early moment when Kirk and Spock make or nearly make physical contact (e.g. Spock gripping Kirk’s elbow to help him regain balance, or even just leaning forward to speak), Kirk shies away. The story later confirms that this was Kirk’s coping mechanism in the face of Spock’s intensifying aloofness:

Kirk’s confusion would eventually give way to hurt, and these were the most difficult times. Spock could not stand to see the captain looking wounded, because the captain so rarely did so [...]


The hurt would subsequently give way to anger—usually only subtly expressed, bitter little digs that were exactly what Spock deserved, when Spock treated every smile and friendly conversational sally from the captain with abrupt coldness. Only when the captain’s attitude dissolved into blankness after the anger did Spock feel he could relax again. This meant Kirk had resolved not to care one way or another, had finally determined that the banter and warmth and special moments they shared were gone for good and he would not try to retrieve them. Then Spock was finally out of danger. It meant that he had managed to resist the urge to comfort the captain.


Kirk, understandably, is salty as hell that Spock won’t talk to him. What’s so admirable about lettered’s writing is that we empathize with both characters, and accept them with all their flaws. Kirk is like a Space Elizabeth Bennet: pretty, witty, and playful, and Spock his conscientious and uber-rational counterpart. We see how Kirk’s pain affects Spock, who is himself in pain because desperately wants to help him but feels like he’ll make things worse. Instead, Spock focuses on what he thinks he can do, and touchingly runs through a mental list of what might physically help Kirk—wearing a sweater, the captain’s favorite coffee blend, a warm water (instead of sonic) shower, a blanket—and for all his familiarity with the captain, he fails to acknowledge that it is his own emotional restraint that has contributed to Kirk’s condition.

Kirk cares about his first officer; despite his feigned cheerfulness, he is still incredibly hurt by Spock’s refusal to confide in him. In the fic’s second sick bay scene, Spock and McCoy discover that Kirk simply believing he is warm causes his affliction to lessen:


Kirk glanced at Spock, then turned back to McCoy. “You mean, if I can convince myself I’m warm, my inner thermostat tones it down.”

“Yeah,” said the doctor. “Think warm thoughts.”


Inexplicably, Kirk looked at Spock again. “Well,” he said, and his smile was one that belonged exclusively to the captain—teasing, slightly rueful, utterly sincere. “Warm thoughts.” Kirk’s voice was a murmur.


“That,” said Doctor McCoy. “That right there. Keep it up.”


Spock cast his gaze to the floor. In certain instances Spock did not regard himself equal to the task of maintaining an emotional equilibrium if eye contact were maintained.


Eleven point eight seconds passed; then Kirk turned back to McCoy. “I can’t think warm thoughts forever. I’ve tried.”


I can’t help it if some people are frigid.”


Amusingly, McCoy knows exactly what’s going on, and Kirk’s looking toward Spock when thinking of warm thoughts is inexplicable to the most intelligent crewmember on the Enterprise.

For the most part, the fic is alternately painfully and delightfully angsty, but there are a bunch of other funny moments as well. Spock seems to have A ThingTM for sweaters; at one point, he defends himself in a line that’s honestly so iconic:“I neither like them nor dislike them. Sweaters are logical.” Even so, lettered uses them meaningfully; Spock thinks to offer Kirk the sweater his mother made him, and in one of Spock and Kirk’s mind-melds Spock shows Kirk a very personal memory of a younger Spock speaking to his mother, who is knitting a sweater.

In “Warm Thoughts,” the whole will-they-or-won’t-they? cliché is tackled head-on, and instead of being irritating, I can actually dig it. Spock first suggests mind-melding as a way to help Kirk perceive warmth, and nearly all of Spock and Kirk’s four mind melds nearly devolve into straight up mind-sex until Spock, spooked, breaks the connection and leaves Kirk to “meditate.” The mind melds here are used as a tool to bare Spock and Kirk’s souls to each other; they generate more vulnerability and require more trust than probably any other contrivance in sci-fi. Vulnerability is central to the narrative as it is to most Hurt/Comfort fics, but also serves as a marker of the “androgyny” of Kirk and Spock’s relationship. Additionally, according to Lamb and Veith, the “...hurt-comfort theme...depends on Kirk’s and Spock’s “feminine” traits: compassion, tenderness, affection, gentleness, altruism, and, most important, the necessity for permission to initiate physical closeness” (Lamb and Veith 108). Part of Spock’s inner fight is that he is worried that exposing himself to the captain, with all his love of Kirk and hatred of himself, will completely destroy not just their relationship, but Kirk himself:

Spock wished that he could feign lack of comprehension, but he remembered what had occurred just before he had broken the mind link—hands touching, lips, the feel of skin to skin. Spock understood all too well, and yet to say so would require explaining that he could not act on such emotion without enslaving himself to it. To venture into such a relationship with the captain would risk reenacting his pon farr all over again, and there was nothing in the conceivable universe Spock less wanted to do than hurt his captain.


Before the fourth and final meld in the fic, Kirk is in the sickbay, his body temperature fatally dropping. Spock performs a hasty mind meld in order to stabilize him, while McCoy and Uhura hurriedly try to synthesize a cure. Spock’s memories involuntarily shift to the fight on Vulcan, at which point Kirk mentally interferes and leads both of their minds in a new direction, toward a new concept of heat: sex. In fact, some of the lines of the fic are reminiscent of T. Jonesy and Killa’s fanvid, “Closer,” such as “...thought was not in words but images, ideas, a feeling: the image of hips rolling. The low, hot snap of desire, a flame of want” and “Jim sent another image: hands on a back—brief, pornographic. With it, Spock could feel the heat of skin on his, the innocent sensation of fingers on his spine, the not-so-innocent sensation of a hard body under his.” The author doesn’t use the Vulcan mind meld simply as a vehicle for sex, but rather a means of binding Kirk and Spock in emotional intimacy. And after their mind meld, McCoy is finally successful in treating the captain. In “Warm Thoughts,” lettered explores a timeline in which the event of “Amok Time” are a lot more sexually charged, and the fallout a lot more agonizing. But, as the closing scene shows Spock seeking out Kirk to finally talk about what happened in Vulcan, the same incident that tore the pair apart has become the means of uniting them.

Or, as tumblr user transienttrash asked “fellas is it gay to have to fuck or die and declaring yourself cured of this after wrestling around in the dirt with your (dude) captain :/"

Yes. <3



Collision

Feb. 6th, 2019 01:54 am
letsgetthisbread: (Default)

Ten minutes before the Enterprise’s maiden voyage, Lieutenant Sulu was sprinting to the bridge.


Swarms of wide-eyed recruits fraternized on the deck, making banal exclamations about how the shininess of the hull, or the neatness of the facilities. And, yeah, the ship
was pretty freakin’ impressive, but Hikaru didn’t have time for sightseeing. After veering ungracefully through the crowd—because apparently four years at Starfleet Academy still wasn’t enough time for people to realize that the middle of the hallway isn’t the best place for a casual chat—he resumed his pace.


And how nice it was for the recruits to have their first real taste of adventure. At the moment, however, Hikaru had slightly more pressing matters. There was an emergency in a system nearly 17 light years away, that damned helmsman McKenna had gotten himself sick, and now he had to frantically dash across an entire craft to command a starship that’d never even been flo--


Thud.


The first time Hikaru ran into Spock was on the newly-christened Enterprise. And by ran into, like, literally collided.


The force of the impact threw Hikaru to the ground; the individual he crashed into, not so much.


Ow. Hikaru blinked, trying to rapidly process what had happened. Above him, a tall figure was looking downward, unimpressed, hands clasped behind his back.


“I’m sorry.” Hikaru said, gripping his side. Because damn did that hurt. Did he run into a person or a brick wall?!


He looked up. Before him, a man (...maybe?) in a blue uniform, entirely unfazed by the incident. Pointed ears, eyebrows sharp enough to kill a man, and bowl cut of a 21st century K-pop star… yup, that’s a Vulcan.


“Apology unnecessary. However, you may note that accelerated collisions with crewmembers are not an effective nor efficient means of navigation.” Space Jungkook replied curtly, before walking off.

Page generated Sep. 2nd, 2026 05:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios